Review
PUBLICATION DATE: JUNE 5, 2012
** FIRST PARAGRAPH CONTAINS SPOILERS FOR FORBIDDEN **
ine years ago Feyn sacrificed herself to ensure Jonathan could come to power and now his time to rule is quickly approaching. Within days he will turn eighteen and take his place as Sovereign of the world. However, Rom’s carefully constructed and nurtured plans take an unexpected turn when Saric discovers Feyn’s location. Instead of Jonathan giving Feyn life, Saric does. But is the life contained in Saric’s blood true life? With Saric’s blood flowing through her veins, her loyalty to her Maker is without question, which leaves the Mortals wondering how Jonathan can possibly come to power. In a book that requires serious suspension of disbelief and struggles with unimaginative, dull characters, Mortal continues to follow the path of Forbidden in being little more than a variation of the Circle series.
I feared Mortal was in trouble when it took me three tries to make it through the first ten pages. However, I’m fairly optimistic and I thought that possibly this book just started out slow. Unfortunately, the slow start doesn’t end until 200+ pages and even then only has short bursts of engaging action. With the exception of approximately 75 pages, this book was a struggle to read. So much so that at one point I rewarded myself with an ice cream sandwich for simply finishing a chapter without taking a break. I’m sorry to say, but this book is essentially Red with a little White, watered down and very, very dull.
One of my biggest complaints with The Book of Mortals series continues to be its similarities with the Circle series. However, there are some differences between the two series, the most noticeable being the lack of any true object of worship by the characters in Mortal. Part of what makes the Circle books phenomenal is their consistent reminder of God, His love for us, and our desire to live life with Him. Unlike the Gathering in the Circle books which focuses on Elyon, the Gathering (yes, it’s called The Gathering) in Mortal has no purpose other than to celebrate life. Perhaps that’s the authors’ point, that these characters are worshiping life and not the Creator of their life, but it just makes the whole event feel empty and meaningless. Granted the characters in Mortal have no true concept of God or exactly what Bliss is, but it makes parts of this book feel pointless. Again, maybe that’s the point of this story, but it doesn’t make for particularly engaging or meaningful reading material.
An even bigger issue with this series is the dull, flat, lifeless characters. While Mortal appears to make an attempt to fix some of the problems with characters, they’re still solidly one dimensional. Rom is the worst; I struggled to make it through every chapter which featured him. Like all the characters, he has a singular focus and he never grows beyond that focus. He wants Jonathan to become Sovereign, so even though he wants to reach Feyn, ultimately his character is limited by his one objective. Same true for Roland, except his focus is his people. Jordin’s focus is Jonathan. Saric’s focus is power. I want more from these characters so that I will be surprised by their actions. Instead, the predictability of this book is increased by the simplicity of characters that lack depth.
If by some chance you haven’t figured out who Jonathan represents by now, the rest of this paragraph is a spoiler for Forbidden and Mortal. I truly enjoy Jonathan’s character. He’s the only one that shows any sense of passion or depth. However, I’m honestly not sure if his character is that much better developed than the others or if I impose my own emotional attachment to him because he’s the Jesus figure in this story. Jonathan’s not that much different than the Jesus figure in the Circle series—having the same impulsive, charismatic enthusiasm about life and people that I see in my Savior. When Dekker sets his mind to depicting Jesus in a fun, creative, and loving manner, that breaks the stoic mold presented by the modern church, he succeeds. Jonathan is one of the few bright spots in this series, but then again, he’s also based on the greatest personality in history.
The allegorical elements of Mortal do not completely work for me. This series pretty much focuses on life/spiritual life through Jesus’ blood. However, there are elements that I think are supposed to be allegorical, that I simply don’t get or I only partially understand. For example, I don’t get the ceremony with the heart at the Gathering. I think it has a purpose, but the purpose eludes me. Also, while I feel that the two makers, Saric and Jonathan is a good portrayal of God who gives life and Satan who presents a false life, I didn’t completely get (or perhaps agree with) some aspects of Saric’s character. I kept thinking everything would eventually click into place and make sense, but unfortunately it never did.
I’ll also admit that I simply don’t care for the allegorical elements concerning Jonathan’s blood. It seems like his blood or conversations, events, etc. about his blood, occupies way more page count than it should. Additionally, as the story wraps up, there are some parts dealing with his blood which left me shaking my head in disbelief. While these scenes probably should have been impacting and inspirational, I was way too concerned with the more practical questions of how this could happen and what would possess people to do this than to appreciate any symbolism.
I really struggled with several of the plans these characters come up with—they seriously lack any thought or consideration. More than once, I kept thinking, is that the best idea they can come up with? This book has several extremely, simplistic plans, totally lacking any thought, which leaves the reader needing to suspend disbelief in an effort to stay involved in the story. I refuse to believe Dekker and Lee couldn’t have come up with more complex, interesting, believable solutions.
Though I’ve pretty much done little but complain about Mortal, it isn’t all bad. There is a fantastic scene that takes place at the Authority of Passing that held my interest quite well. The scene is reminiscent of a Nazi concentration camp and adds an emotional depth and connection to the environment that I desperately need. It also serves as one of the few times in which the authors show a character’s personality rather than tell about it. Another nice aspect is the allegorical element depicting the Jewish people’s expectation of Jesus. There’s a nice subtly to this storyline and I appreciated feeling the confusion of the Mortals rather than being told about it. Also, the events leading up to and including the climax are fairly interesting. They’re very predictable, but at least I was able to stay engaged in the story for 50-75 pages.
While I didn’t particularly enjoy Mortal, I will finish the series when Sovereign releases next year. I have complete confidence that both Dekker and Lee can wow me in the final book.








Mmmm… ice cream sandwich.
I own book one but haven’t read it yet because I’ve learned long ago to wait until all the books of a trilogy are out before commencing. It’s sad to see you didn’t care for book two but if I can sneak an ice cream sandwich past the wife it may not be too bad. Maybe book three will make it worth it all.
Hehe….the ice cream sandwich was worth the effort.
I have been very disappointed in this series. I’m really shocked to at how these two fantastic authors are writing books with so little imagination and such dreadfully dull characters. I really hope you like the series much better than I do. Of course I hope everyone who picks up this series likes it much better than I do.
My husband thought the same thing about “Forbidden.” He was very disappointed with it – so much so that he didn’t have any interest in reading this one. We were so impressed with some of Dekker’s earlier work (“Thr3e” being an all-time favorite) that we just don’t understand where his writing has gone lately.
I haven’t read any Dekker in YEARS. Well, I’ve TRIED. I get a little bit in and I get bored and/or frustrated with the repetitive monotony of it all. However, I STILL recommend “Heaven’s Wager” and “Thr3e” to people all the time. Johnny Depp’s “Secret Window” has NOTHING on “Thr3e.”
Warning, this is going to be long.
I’ve been fairly tough on Ted’s last several books, because they simply aren’t working for me. I know what he can write and I know that what he’s writing now is not a good demonstration of his talents. However, I greatly respect him for what he’s done for the Christian market and a heart that is dedicated to showing people God’s unconditional love.
Unfortunately I think he’s narrowed his focus to the point that he’s so much wants people to understand this love that he’s let other issues that he used to touch on fall to the side. His spiritual focus seems to have completely shifted from Christians to non-Christians. Ironically though his writing is now more blatantly Christian than ever. There is very little subtly in letting the reader get what he’s showing them. Instead it’s spelled out and and it’s usually spelled out repeatedly. I think this indicates what Michelle (see comment below) states. He’s trying to please the Christian audience by spelling out the message while at the same time providing a story that’s dark and edgy for the general market.
Ted’s earlier books like Thr3e, Blink (NOT Blink of an Eye), Circle series (only Black, Red, and White), and Showdown were incredible. There was something there for both Christians and non-Christians. Throughout his books were wonderful spiritual messages and encouragement. I highly recommend his earlier books and dearly wish he’d return to that style.
However, even though I’m not pleased with his recent books I’ll still continue to read them. After Immanuel’s Veins I was going to take a very long break from his books. But I saw a question on an authors FB page which asked (paraphrased here) would we read a lot of duds by an author to get to a good one. Is the good book worth it? For the chance to dive into Elyon’s water’s again and explore the dark edges of the human heart to be reminded of the light of Jesus, yeah I’ll gut out books like Mortal and Immanuel’s Veins. I know what Ted can do and I know the talent he possesses. He’s moved my heart and lifted my spirits before with his books, I believe he can do it again. When he does, it’ll be worth it.
I work in an Independent Christian Bookstore, and we’ve seen Dekker’s sales nose-dive after the fourth book in the Circle series. He’s gotten too far out for conservative Christians, not far out enough for liberal readers, and the secular community thinks he writes amazing fiction but nothing at all ‘religious’. Personally I think Dekker has lost the one main pillar every storyteller has to cling to:
Know Your Audience.
He doesn’t know who he’s writing for any more, and so he’s all over the map. You can’t DO that. And the fact that he’s writing with another author, Tosca Lee (she’s a whole other issue) isn’t helping him remain focused.
Michelle, I’m really surprised that his Christian Bookstore sales started going down around that time. I thought it might have been a little later. However, I’m not surprised to find out it has. I think you’re exactly right. He’s trying to write for two audiences and as a result his writing has suffered.
I feel the complete opposite of the way you feel about this book. I loved this book immensely and it is, in fact, one of my favorite Dekker books of all time. I don’t know what it is with you and the fact that you slam Dekker in all of your reviews. I couldn’t put this book down, and was constantly holding my breath, waiting to know what would happen next.
Both Forbidden and Mortal were amazing books and I loved them immensely. Urgh…
You anger me immensely.
Pardon me.
Taylor,
We have brought on several reviewers over the last few years and many of them have given Dekker’s books a fair chance. In fact, even after disliking a previous title, we have continued to review his works in hopes that we’ll like the next title. However, there seems to be a theme emerging from various reviewers that Dekker’s recent works are not up to par with his earlier outing or that he has simply retread old territory. It seems your disappointment stems from being a fan of the author’s rather than a reviewer. We look for pros and cons in all author’s works. Dekker’s is not the only author who has consistently gotten poor marks, but we DO attempt to point out the good as well as the bed in our reviewing process. Our review is not the be-all-end-all of what ought to shape your opinion, but we do attempt to be honest in how we approach each book that comes across our desk. Thanks so much for your input and hope that you do not remain angry too long. Blessings and peace.
Calvin Moore
Founder
The Christian Manifesto
Hi Taylor. I’m sorry that you feel my views of Dekker’s books are unfair or that I am slamming him. However, I do not slam Dekker in all my reviews. With the exception of “The Priest’s Graveyard” I have read and reviewed every book he’s written and that includes the two children’s stories and two non-fiction titles. I think that’s 34 books if I’ve counted properly. Of those 34 books, I’ve given 5 critical reviews (four of those were on co-authored books–House, Forbidden, Mortal, and Kiss) and 4 reviews (Boneman’s Daughters, The Bride Collector, Green, and Skin) that weren’t 100% positive. So 74% of the time I’ve given glowing reviews. I don’t think I’ve been particularly harsh to Dekker.
If you haven’t read my earlier reviews, I can see why you feel this way as 3 of my critical reviews have been after I started writing for TCM. However, this is coincidence as it is also the time in which I feel his books have taken a very downward turn. Starting at “Sinner”, I began to feel his work had taken a significant step down in quality, but continued to be fairly positive in my reviews. But as his quality has continued to decline, it’s been increasingly harder to overlook the issues that had irritating me for several books.
I’m glad that you love this book. I want readers to love an author’s books, even those books that I don’t particularly care for. There is no clause in Dekker’s contract that says he has to write a book I personally enjoy. And I think both Dekker and I are quite alright that I didn’t love this book. But please, tell others how much you love “Mortal” and “Forbidden”. I’m happy for you. You got something from this book and you enjoyed it. That’s why we read, for entertainment and it’s why authors write. Send Dekker an email telling him how much you love his books and if you haven’t done it yet, post a review on Amazon. Support his work if you feel that it’s fantastic, but in the end, this is all opinions and we simply disagree.
Melissa,
I am very sorry that I commented with such a scathing attitude. I had read many reviews of Mortal the other night that totally bagged on Ted. One said, “I would give this book negative stars because it was so horrible.” I shouldn’t have acted the way I did. Please forgive me.
Your review does make sense to me now that I am reading it over once more. Ted is really special to me as a Christian and to see bad reviews strikes a nerve. I apologize.
Taylor
No problems Taylor. There’s nothing wrong with being passionate about the authors we love. We’re good.
I am also quite sad that the reviews of Ted’s recent works are negative. I myself have actually enjoyed Ted’s new work (including “Mortal” and “Forbidden”) immensly. One of my favorite books of all-time is “The Bride Collector”. “Forbidden” and “Mortal” also are among my favorites. I do understand your problems with his works, even if I don’t agree with them. My hope is that his future works such as “The Sanctuary” and “Sovereign” will impress you.
I too am hoping to be impressed by his next book and I go into every one of his novels with very nigh expectations. Trust me, no one wants to love his books more than I do. I miss my jaw on the floor, sitting in awe moments. I’m desperately hoping to be blown away again by his work.
I’m curious, have you read Ted’s older books like Black, Red, White, Thr3e, Blink, and Showdown? If so, what do you think of them?
I’m glad to hear that.
The Circle Series is what brought me to love Ted. I’m so pro-Ted because, without Red, I wouldn’t be here, now. He really opened my eyes to Jesus and who he really is. Red made something that seemed merely story into a real, amazing thing.
I realize that was meant towards Evan, but, I just thought I would reply.
You know Taylor, that’s exactly what I miss about Ted’s current writing. I adore Red–all the Circle books really. There is so much in that series that just puts Christianity in a new light.
***SPOILER for RED***
This is just one example from The Circle books where Ted really bought to life an aspect of Christian history. I never truly understood how the Jews could be so blind. How could they not see Jesus as the Messiah? Because I couldn’t form a definitive answer on Justin, it truly sunk in how the Jews could have gotten it so wrong.
***END SPOILER***
Since I cared about the characters in the Circle books as they are alive, vibrant, and ever evolving, I was fully engaged in these stories and could feel the level of emotion needed to see things differently. While it isn’t integral to Black, I love Elyon turning the world upside down. It’s not a major part of the story, but it was creative, inventive, and takes God out of the frumpy, stoic mold He’s been put into. These type of things are what I miss about Ted’s writing. I want to see this level of creativity, passion, emotion, and detail back into his books.
But I’d like to hear from others. What about Ted’s work–current or past–has really touched your life and changed your perspective on faith? Just remember to put in spoiler warnings.
Yes, I have read all the Books of History Chronicles and most of Ted’s earlier work– and I loved them. Saint is one of my favorites of Ted’s. I loved the Circle series as well. Elyon and the Great Romance between him and his bride and the red lakes were wonderful.
However, I am liking his newer works more. Granted, Boneman’s Daughters isn’t my favorite of his works. The Bride Collector and The Priest’s Graveyard are among the top, TBC being my second all-time favorite of his. TBC showed me that we are all God’s favorites, that we are all beautiful. TPG put me through a journey with Renee and Danny about the law and that we should judge not lest we be judged.
Immanuel’s Veins is my favorite book of Ted’s and is my #1 favorite as it has been since I read it before it was released. It showed the romance between God and his bride (Circle series) and how we should love each other. It was a beautiful tale that grabbed me from the start.
I think comparing his new works to the Circle/BoHC is a little unfair. He did that story. He put us through the beauty of Elyon and the sacrafice he made for us. I think we should look at what he is doing now without comparing it to his past work. If we all did this, maybe we would find more good in the stories that Ted is now sharing with us.
Just for the record, lets not get the Taylors mixed up.